---
title: "Routing"
description: "1 posts about Routing, summarised, each linking to the original."
---

# Routing
> 1 posts about Routing, summarised, each linking to the original.

## Articles

### [GLM-5.3 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol on DeepSWE: Cost, Coding, and Routing](https://yomu.fyi/post/glm-5-3-vs-gpt-5-6-sol-on-deepswe-cost-coding-and-routing.md)
- Company: [Together AI](https://yomu.fyi/company/together-ai.md)
- Published: Aug 21, 2026
- Type: Benchmark

GLM-5.3 and GPT-5.6 Sol were evaluated on 113 DeepSWE tasks with 904 rollouts, comparing accuracy, cost, and failure patterns. Sol edges ahead at pass@1 (72.7% vs 69.0%), but GLM-5.3 leads at pass@4 (87.6% vs 85.8%) at $3.99 per rollout, half Sol’s $8.37 cost and yielding 17 solves per $100 versus Sol’s 9. Their low per-task correlation of 0.43 makes a cascade effective: GLM-5.3 first, then Sol on test failure, achieving 85.9% solved at $6.61 per task. Sol runs faster (19 minutes, 61 steps vs 35 minutes, 124 steps) and achieves higher reliability (61 tasks solved all four tries vs 48), but it breaks passing tests in 20% of failures versus GLM-5.3’s 11%.