So You Need to Hire Good Engineers

Summary

Hiring strategies in fast-growing technology startups dictate the quality and scalability of expanding engineering teams. Insights gathered from conversations with over one hundred engineering leaders identify crucial evaluation criteria across technical competence, cultural alignment, and problem-solving capability. Candidates rarely present a perfect technical fit, requiring hiring managers to weigh passion, willingness to learn, and risk appetite against baseline technical requirements. Rather than focusing solely on static factual questions, interviewers gain deeper insights by probing the rationale behind candidates' architectural and implementation choices. High-caliber engineers ultimately elevate team capability by simplifying complex challenges, writing cleaner code, and learning quickly.

Context

Fast-growing technology startups need effective hiring strategies to recruit capable engineers while scaling their teams.

Approach / What changed

Synthesizing hiring insights from over one hundred engineering leaders to evaluate candidates across technical-versus-cultural balance, problem-simplification abilities, and deep inquiry into underlying technical decisions.

Takeaways

• Evaluating candidates on the rationale behind past technical decisions reveals more about their problem-solving depth and potential than static factual trivia.
• A candidate with an approximate 80% technical match can succeed if they exhibit passion, risk appetite, and continuous eagerness to learn.
• Strong engineering hires improve overall team capability by transforming complex problems into simpler solutions and raising the team's average talent bar.

Related reading

• Grab · Oct 4, 2017

  The Art of Hiring Good Engineers

  Building and scaling engineering teams requires adapting recruitment strategies across different organizational sizes, from initial hires to hundreds of engineers. Teams often begin with small groups of battle-tested engineers before designing formal hiring pipelines. The recruitment approach outlines four key steps: sourcing top-tier talent from platforms like GitHub and LinkedIn, assessing technical fit through tailored screens or assignments, evaluating cross-functional and culture fit via group interviews, and optimizing the process. This optimization includes routing candidates strategically to strict bar-raiser interviewers to prevent burnout and expedite decisions.

  Rachel Lee

• Grab · Feb 16, 2017

  How Grab Hires Engineers in Singapore

  Grab maintains a selective engineering recruitment process in Singapore, with only three to five percent of candidates ultimately receiving an offer. The evaluation pipeline typically spans three to four weeks and includes an initial HR phone screen, an online coding round, and consecutive technical interviews. Recruiters assess candidate capability via public GitHub projects, presentations, and technical blogs rather than traditional CV qualifications alone. The company prioritizes experience in low-latency distributed systems and microservices design alongside strong cultural alignment with peer collaboration.

  Daniel Tay

• Grab · Sep 25, 2019

  Being a Principal Engineer at Grab

  Grab's rapid growth resulted in roughly 350 microservices powering its superapp, creating the need for defined individual contributor career milestones. At Grab, a principal engineer oversees the architecture of an entire Tech Family, a sub-organisation containing over 50 engineers and 20 or more microservices. Responsibilities include translating broad, ambiguous problems into concrete projects, managing technical debt, and aligning multiple engineering teams across global R&D centres. The role demands continuous technical leadership through RFC design reviews, cross-functional communication, mentorship, and self-directed prioritization alongside engineering leadership. Ultimately, principal engineers amplify engineering quality and operational stability without directly managing people.

  Roman Atachiants

• Jetbrains · Aug 25, 2026

  Ideas Worth a Longer Conversation: The JetBrains Research Podcast

  The JetBrains Research Podcast investigates foundational software development and computer science questions through discussions with industry researchers. In team psychology, Cat Hicks demonstrates that collaborative culture and organizational belonging reduce developer anxiety around automated tooling while curbing the risks of overproduction pressure. Historical analysis by Tomáš Petříček shows that programming spans five competing cultures rather than pure specification implementation, explaining why automated code generation historically encounters limits. Regarding artificial intelligence evaluation, Ibragim Badertdinov details how SWE-rebench isolates model capability through dataset decontamination, leveraging the strict verifiability of software test execution for training feedback. Additionally, conversations with Alexander Kulikov and Anna Kogan examine how foundational mathematical understanding aids AI oversight and address adoption hurdles for open-source computer vision infrastructure.

  Katie Fraser