Loading post…
JetbrainsJelena IlicExplainer
What Makes a Great KotlinConf Proposal?
Summary
The KotlinConf 2027 Call for Papers is open, and the post offers guidance for crafting a strong proposal, emphasizing that a valuable talk can come from a simple lesson learned rather than a groundbreaking discovery. Reviewers first notice the overall care, including a clear title and focused abstract, and they can detect AI-generated content, so authenticity and a personal voice are crucial. A good proposal starts with a central story that identifies a problem, what was tried, and what was learned, even from a small project, and it should be tested with colleagues. The title should communicate the topic and benefit, avoiding vagueness, while the abstract should provide two to three paragraphs of meaningful detail that outline the talk’s journey and include concrete takeaways. The post advises choosing the right format between lightning and regular sessions, and reviewing the proposal for clarity and authenticity before submitting.
Context
KotlinConf 2027 has opened its Call for Papers, and many developers, especially first-time speakers, are unsure how to craft a compelling proposal. The post provides advice from program committee members and experienced speakers to guide submitters.
Approach / What changed
The post advises submitters to start with a central story that identifies a problem, what was tried, and what was learned. It recommends writing a clear and informative title that communicates the topic and benefit, and building an abstract of two to three focused paragraphs that outline the talk’s journey and include concrete takeaways. Submitters should test their idea with colleagues, choose the right format (lightning or regular session), and review the proposal for clarity and authenticity before submitting, ensuring it reflects their own voice and experience.
Takeaways
Reviewers first notice the care taken in the proposal, including a clear title and focused abstract, and they can detect AI-generated content, so authenticity is crucial.
A strong title communicates at least two of: main topic, problem, context, practical benefit, or expected experience level, and should avoid vagueness.
The abstract should be two to three paragraphs that outline the talk’s journey and include concrete takeaways, not a single sentence or a full script.
FAQ
What do reviewers notice first in a proposal?
Reviewers first notice the overall care taken in the proposal, including a clear title and focused abstract. They can detect AI-generated content, so authenticity and a personal voice are crucial for a positive evaluation.
How detailed should the abstract be?
Two to three focused paragraphs are usually enough to provide meaningful detail. Avoid a single vague sentence or a very long description; the abstract should outline the talk's journey and include concrete takeaways.
Should I submit if I am a first-time speaker?
Yes, previous conference experience is not required. A clear and authentic proposal based on your own experience can be more compelling than a polished one with little substance. First-time speakers are encouraged to submit their ideas.
Source and freshness
- Source
- blog.jetbrains.com
- Published
- Added to Yomu
Summaries are generated from the original by a language model. Check the original before relying on it.
Keep reading
Related reading
The Good Stuff
Paid picks we use ourselves. Links carry a referral code — a subscription through one earns us a commission at no extra cost to you.
The best engineering reads, once a week
One useful email. Unsubscribe anytime.