Hugging FaceAlexander Gurung, Rafael PardinasBenchmark
MosaicLeaks: Can your research agent keep a secret?
Summary
MosaicLeaks examines privacy leakage in deep-research agents that combine private enterprise documents with external web retrieval. Queries that appear harmless individually can reveal sensitive facts when an observer combines them over multiple hops, producing intent, answer, or full-information leakage. The benchmark contains 1,001 multi-hop chains interleaving local and web questions, and compares baseline behavior with task-only reinforcement learning and Privacy-Aware Deep Research (PA-DR). Task-only training raises strict chain success from 48.7% to 59.3% but increases answer/full-information leakage from 34.0% to 51.7%, whereas PA-DR reaches 58.7% success with 9.9% leakage by rewarding stage-specific decisions and penalizing query-level privacy risk. The evaluation is controlled, using synthetic enterprise documents, a fixed web corpus, three company contexts, and one multi-hop question-answering harness.
Context
Deep-research agents increasingly combine private local documents with external tools such as web retrieval. Their outbound queries can expose private research intent or facts because an observer can combine fragments across a query log, even when no individual query reveals the complete information. The benchmark is designed to measure this mosaic effect in multi-hop tasks that interleave public and private information.
Approach / What changed
MosaicLeaks constructs 1,001 multi-hop chains from enterprise documents and a controlled web corpus, with bridge entities linking successive local and web questions. PA-DR combines situational task rewards for decisions at each research stage with a learned privacy reward that estimates direct and cumulative mosaic-leakage risk in web queries, penalizing the larger risk.
Takeaways
Task-only reinforcement learning raises strict chain success from 48.7% to 59.3%, but increases answer/full-information leakage from 34.0% to 51.7%.
PA-DR achieves 58.7% strict chain success and reduces answer/full-information leakage to 9.9%, while issuing more web queries than the base model.
Situational rewards reach comparable task performance with roughly 5–6 times fewer generated training samples than outcome-only reinforcement learning, and PA-DR retains that sample-efficiency benefit.
Source and freshness
- Source
- huggingface.co
- Published
- Added to Yomu
- Last updated
Summaries are generated from the original by a language model. Check the original before relying on it.
Keep reading
Related reading
The Good Stuff
Paid picks we use ourselves. Links carry a referral code — a subscription through one earns us a commission at no extra cost to you.
The best engineering reads, once a week
One useful email. Unsubscribe anytime.