GrabDavid KhuProblem & solution
TechDocs at Grab: Cultivating a culture of quality documentation
Summary
Grab’s TechDocs working group describes a two- to three-year effort to make high-quality documentation part of everyday engineering culture. Built on the Helix engineering platform and a Docs-as-Code workflow, TechDocs gives teams a central place to create, manage, and access technical content, while user research informs tool and process changes. The programme combines inventory-taking, policy, team enablement, and recurring measurement, using broad surveys and 1:1 observation to identify fragmented tools, weak ownership, search problems, and maintenance gaps. Research found that only 2% of engineers reported resolving 80–100% of on-call questions through documentation; later initiatives included an editor, writing training, practical workshops, and recognition tied partly to documentation quality and on-call-bot response accuracy. Planned work includes better navigation, training, feedback loops, and editing workflows.
Context
Grab wanted to shift documentation from scattered, inconsistently maintained team practices into a trusted part of everyday engineering work. User research identified fragmented tools, unclear ownership, difficult search and navigation, outdated or duplicate content, migration effort, and limited awareness of TechDocs capabilities.
Approach / What changed
The TechDocs working group used a four-part, quarterly programme over two to three years: assess existing processes and behaviour, establish and iterate policy, empower teams with tools and training, and track metrics while recognising good practice. The work combined surveys, 1:1 research, the TechDocs Editor on Helix, writing courses, hands-on workshops, and measurement of documentation quality through on-call-bot response accuracy.
Takeaways
Only 2% of surveyed engineers said that documentation resolved 80–100% of their on-call questions; 29% reported a 40–60% resolution range, and 25% reported 20–40%.
TechDocs Editor improvements were prioritised from user research, including better merge-request creation, conflict resolution, previewing, bulk migration, and clearer separation between TechDocs and the Wiki.
Training used info-typing guidelines and writing practices, followed by workshops where engineers revised their own user-facing documentation with feedback from Tech Content Developers.
Source and freshness
- Source
- engineering.grab.com
- Published
- Added to Yomu
- Last updated
Summaries are generated from the original by a language model. Check the original before relying on it.
Keep reading
Related reading
The Good Stuff
Paid picks we use ourselves. Links carry a referral code — a subscription through one earns us a commission at no extra cost to you.
The best engineering reads, once a week
One useful email. Unsubscribe anytime.