Hugging FaceEric Bezzam, Shobhit Banga, Manas Dhir, Bhaskar Singh, Manmeet Kaur, Aaditya Pareek, Walecha, Sagar Jain, Hanuman Sidh, Vanshika ChhabraAnnouncement
The Open ASR Leaderboard Adds Its First Global South Language
Summary
Voice Arena and Hugging Face have added two Monsoon evaluation sets, en-IN and hi-IN, to the Open ASR Leaderboard, introducing Indian English and Hindi coverage. The initiative addresses a limitation of aggregate WER: existing test sets record what was said but little about who spoke, making disparities across geography, age, gender, accent, devices, and other conditions difficult to see. The four speaker-disjoint public and private splits contain 4,888 speakers and vary across nine collection axes, using unscripted dual-channel conversations, broad district and device coverage, and 12 speaker metadata attributes. Because Hindi has extensive valid orthographic variation, its references use manually curated lattices and are scored with Orthographically-Informed Word Error Rate (OIWER); comparisons with flattened references show higher, non-uniform error rates and changed system rankings.
Context
Aggregate ASR leaderboard scores can conceal differences in error rates across populations because existing test sets generally record the speech content but little information about who spoke. Hindi also presents substantial orthographic variation, including multiple valid spellings, code-mixed terms, and joined or separated compound forms that a conventional normaliser cannot reliably collapse.
Approach / What changed
Voice Arena and Hugging Face collected four speaker-disjoint Monsoon splits for Indian English and Hindi, with public and private portions, broad geographic and device coverage, spontaneous conversations, and speaker metadata. Hindi references use manually curated lattices of valid orthographic variants and are scored with OIWER. The Indian English set joins the main leaderboard, while Hindi appears in its multilingual evaluation.
Takeaways
The four Monsoon splits comprise 4,888 speakers, and more than half of the speakers in each split appear exactly once; the ten largest contributors account for 2.8% to 6.8% of total duration.
Hindi lattices admit multiple written forms for each transcript span, with variants gathered from ASR outputs and language models and then judged by native-speaker linguists.
Scoring hypotheses against flattened Hindi references increases error rates for every tested system, not uniformly, and changes some system rankings compared with lattice-based scoring.
Source and freshness
- Source
- huggingface.co
- Published
- Added to Yomu
- Last updated
Summaries are generated from the original by a language model. Check the original before relying on it.
Keep reading
Related reading
The Good Stuff
Paid picks we use ourselves. Links carry a referral code — a subscription through one earns us a commission at no extra cost to you.
The best engineering reads, once a week
One useful email. Unsubscribe anytime.