How AI is transforming analytics at Grab

Summary

Grab is restructuring its analytics operations using a five-level AI autonomy ladder, transitioning analysts from manual artifact creation to problem framing and decision governance. The architecture leverages domain-specific systems like Spartan to process natural language queries through certified metric indexes and Scarlet to triage and repair failing data pipelines. To prevent agent hallucinations, ContextIQ manages context lifecycles by automatically updating metric definitions, SQL references, and golden-dataset test cases when instrumentation changes or failures occur. Furthermore, data teams use an internal portal called BriX to configure custom analytics surfaces and automated root-cause analysis commentaries using reusable Model Context Protocol connections. Autonomy scales mechanical query and validation tasks while keeping human oversight focused on canonical metric definitions and strategic sign-offs.

Takeaways

• Spartan routes natural language analytics requests across more than 50 skills and 120 analysis frameworks, distinguishing between deep diagnostic queries and direct metadata reads from experiment platforms.
• ContextIQ maintains agent reliability by automatically patching context documents and opening merge requests with golden-dataset test cases whenever new instrumentation or failure modes are identified.
• The Scarlet agent operates at Level 4 autonomy by running root-cause analysis on failing data pipelines and applying fixes directly unless failures exceed documented runbooks.

Related reading

• Grab · Apr 30, 2026

  Data Mesh at Grab (Part II): The foundational tools behind certification

  Grab operationalizes its Signals Marketplace data mesh through integrated platforms designed for continuous data certification and observability. The central metadata management platform, Hubble, extends open-source DataHub to model metadata as an event-driven graph and expose search, lineage, ownership, and data contracts. An automated certification engine built on the DataHub Actions framework continuously evaluates metadata changes, classifying assets into Uncertified, Certified, CertifiedPlus, or Revoked states. Genchi serves as the data quality observability layer, using Temporal and Kafka to run checks for freshness, volume completeness, schema stability, and semantic rules. To eliminate false-positive alerts caused by decoupled cron schedules, Genchi integrates with the Lighthouse monitoring service to trigger quality tests immediately upon pipeline completion.

  Aezo Teo

• Grab · May 15, 2026

  Scaling developer experience: How we improved Android Studio in a large monorepo

  Grab's passenger Android monorepo contains roughly 2,000 modules and 11 million lines of code, leading to IDE sync times exceeding 35 minutes on cold starts. While Bazel handles application builds, Android Studio relies on Gradle sync to construct its project model, requiring Gradle to evaluate every module during configuration. To solve this bottleneck, the team built a custom Focus plugin that restricts IDE syncing to target modules and their direct dependencies. The architecture reuses a static dependency graph generated during existing Gradle-to-Bazel migration tasks to eliminate the Gradle configuration phase during module selection. An IntelliJ extension and a Groovy method-shadowing technique in settings.gradle allow developers to configure focused modules directly through a graphical user interface.

  Rifqi Fahmi

• Grab · Mar 12, 2026

  Enabling R8 optimization at scale with AI-assisted debugging

  Grab experienced widespread Application Not Responding spikes across its Android superapp, driven by memory pressure and complex Jetpack Compose layouts embedded in legacy code. While switching to advanced R8 optimization promised significant performance gains, obfuscated stack traces and two-hour remote compilation cycles stalled investigation across nine million lines of code. To resolve this, engineers built Model Context Protocol tools to automate APK decompilation, deobfuscation, and code context extraction. The team paired these tools with an AI workflow that used the GitLab CLI to generate multiple solution branches and run verification builds in parallel. This strategy replaced hours of manual reverse engineering with minutes of automated analysis, allowing the team to debug and validate aggressive optimizations at scale.

  Nguyen Van Minh

• Grab · Jul 30, 2026

  Crowdsourced taxonomy verification: A feedback-driven framework for refining knowledge graph relationships via online search interactions

  Maintaining accurate Knowledge Graphs in dynamic domains like e-commerce and food delivery is challenging because automated language models frequently hallucinate relationships while manual curation cannot scale. To validate structural taxonomy links continuously, a closed-loop verification framework operationalizes search interfaces by injecting unverified candidate edges as hypotheses into live user traffic. The system uses an exploration-exploitation strategy to place candidate relationships in lower-risk interface slots, tracking contextually anchored micro-interactions such as clicks, dwell times, and purchases. An offline verification engine aggregates these weighted interactions into normalized confidence scores, automatically promoting verified links to permanent graph edges and pruning refuted relationships.

  Junpeng Niu